|
|
| Also
known as: |
Old
Peak |
| Also
known as: |
Machupicchu |
| Also
known as: |
Macchu
Picchu |
| Built: |
~1450
|
| Type: |
Castle/Fortress Click here to see others. |
| Observation
deck: |
Many |
| Location: |
Overlooking
the Urubamba valley |
This
is one of the sites where you can get a real glimpse
of pre-Columbian South America. It was hidden from
Western eyes until 1911 when Professor Hiram Bingham
of Yale University was taken there by a local resident.
He was seeking the fabled "lost city of the Incas"
and for many years it was believed that Machu Piccu
is that city. Later archaeological evidence has proved
otherwise. In reality, Machu Piccu is one of a series
of fortress towns along a footpath. It may also have
been home to a palace. Why this city in the sky was
abandoned is uncertain. One theory holds that the
water supply was inadequate for such a large population.
Visiting requires a certain amount of physical strength
as the location is 7,710 feet above sea level. The
many terraces are connected by pathways, and sometimes
by foot- and hand-holds carved into the rock like
ladders. Much of the trip can be made by railway,
but the last 1,640 vertical feet must be walked over
the course of several days up steps, through tunnels,
and across bridges.
- 1983
- Named a UNESCO World Heritage site.
- August,
1997 - A forest fire damages Machu Piccu's famed
Inca Bridge.
- August,
1999 - Preservationists are outraged by a plan to
build a cable car lift to bring tourists to Machu
Piccu.
- 2000
- Fears of erosion caused the number of visitors
to be limited.
- September,
2000 - A huge sundial known as the "Hitching Post
of the Sun" is damaged during filming of a beer
commercial. The crane which fell on the sun clock
was specifically prohibited by the National Institute
of Culture.
- March,
2001 - Japanese geologists warn that Machu Piccu
could be destroyed by a landslide. It is moving
about six inches per year.
- 14
October, 2002 - Archaeologists have found a new
Incan tomb at Machu Picchu. It contains the graves
of three people and a number of objects they were
buried with. The tomb is considered the best-preserved
one of its kind.
- 18
March, 2003 - The New York Times reports that Machu
Piccu may not be the lost city of the Incas, after
all. The article details information from a new
traveling exhibit on Machu Piccu that shows the
massive complex in the clouds was nothing more than
a retreat for the emperor – the Incan equivalent
of Schloß Schönbrunn in Vienna.
The determination was made by examining skeletal
remains, Spanish legal documents, and artifacts
shipped by the original explorers to Yale University,
and subsequently put into storage without much interest.
|
|
|
|